Displaying 7 - 9 of 11

Page 1 2 3 4

Letting God Be God

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

Vol.XXVI                         March 2, 2011                         No.5


Letting God be God


In our daily bible reading, we have spent the last couple of weeks in the book of Leviticus.  It is an interesting study, and at the same time it contains some of the most tedious reading in all of the Bible.  The degree of detail throughout the book is exhausting -  the various sacrifices, the designations concerning what is clean or unclean, the problem of leprosy, moral instruction, Sabbath regulations, etc.  I cannot envision living under a system of worship, or life for that matter, that would be so demanding and fastidious.  How could those people remember it all?  Did they not live in constant fear of missing a detail?  And interspersed throughout the book  are warnings or examples of punishment that accentuate God’s personal holiness and justice.  In Lev.10:1f, Nadab and Abihu offer “profane fire before the LORD, which He had not commanded them” and God strikes them dead.  Again, in Lev.24:10f, a young man engaged in a fight “blasphemed the name of the LORD and cursed” and God commanded the people to take him outside the camp and stone him to death.  And such examples of severity only serve to amplify the many demands of God for extreme measures of discipline.  Capital punishment alone was demanded for everything from improper entry into the Most Holy Place to idolatry to cursing one’s parents to sexual immorality/perversion to witchcraft.  Add to this the overwhelming attention given to the consideration of sin and sacrifice; holiness and ceremonial cleanness; feast days and Sabbath laws; inheritance and redemption.  It is in many ways, a frightening and confounding part of God’s revelation.


That being said, I enjoy preaching  out of Leviticus, because there are some wonderful insights into the mind of God therein.  It seems to me that the concepts of justice and holiness are intended to make an impression upon us.  And while there is clearly a great emphasis upon the mercy of God as He provided forgiveness/atonement through a system of animal sacrifices, there are few other books in the bible that offer such a singular glimpse at the uncompromising demands of our God.  And that, in and of itself, is instructive, for the requirements of much of this book would have clearly tested the faith of individuals who lived under the Mosaic covenant.  How many farmers would let their land lie fallow every seventh year, trusting that God would provide enough in the sixth year to not only live on for three years, but to have enough seed left to replant after the Sabbath year (Lev.25)?  How many people would actually participate in the stoning of a child who cursed his parents?  How many masters would release  their slaves or return purchased property in the year of Jubilee (Lev.25)?  How many people would only offer as sacrifices the very best animals that they had, knowing that the sacrifice of such would insure that what was left for breeding stock was inferior (Lev.22:17f)?  How many people who developed some suspicious skin ailment would  subject themselves to a priest’s examination, knowing that they might well be cut off from society (Lev.13f)?  How many of the Israelites, when no one else was around to witness the matter, would conform themselves to the tedium of Leviticus?


In all of its details, all of its demands, all of its distinctions, all of its punishments, the book of Leviticus would test in Israel whether or not the people would be willing to let God be God.  And isn’t that the great challenge that people have always faced when it comes to religious considerations?  You have to think that those folks would have objected to some of God’s demands, or at the very least found some of them to be either distasteful, or subject to modification.  I don’t know exactly what Nadab and Abihu did that constituted the fire in their censers to be “profane”, but the very term that describes it means that it was foreign or adulterous - that their activity was a violation of their covenant with God.  It must have seemed to them either insignificant or indifferent in some way.  But it was not so with God.   And what about all of those little details involving the sacrifices?  What if the priest sprinkled the blood of the sin offering on the veil of the tabernacle only six times instead of seven?  If you consider carefully the language, then the forgiveness offered in those sacrifices was conditioned upon the proper offering of them (Lev.4:20,26,35).  We often tend of view such details as minute aspects of service that simply cannot be that important.  But in so doing, are we not assuming the role of God Himself? 


One of the great downfalls of modern “Christianity” is the almost absolute neglect of authority for religious activity and doctrine.  Most everyone gives lip service to the idea that God is God and that He has given all authority to Jesus Christ (Mt.28:18f).  But how many folks really measure what we believe and do by what we can find in the bible?  The only apparent standard upon which decisions are made by religious entities these days is whether or not the matter seems to be capable of attracting a crowd.  Worship is obviously entertainment-driven.  Doctrine is subjected to the dogma of inclusiveness and political correction.  Even modern standards of morality are as determined by social acceptance as they are by God’s revelation.  Don’t believe me?  Just look at the immodest attire in the average worship service or the number of those unscripturally divorced and remarried within almost any given religious body or the percentage of single “Christians” who are sexually active.  Does anyone care much anymore about what God says?  Do we examine our grand ideas with the question, “Does God authorize this?”


Many times I’ve heard people make distinctions in religious matters between what they consider “salvation issues” and “non-salvation issues”, and I can appreciate that there are questions that I do not have to have answered in order to obey God.  But are we trying to consider His Word from His perspective?  Am I playing God by deciding what is important and what isn’t?  Isn’t part of true faith accepting and obeying God’s demands even though they may not suit my own preferences or traditions or understandings?  And is it my right to decry, alter, or ignore His revelation and still expect Him to save me?   I’m really glad that the covenant to which Leviticus is attached is not the covenant under which I live.  But, regardless of the covenant or the demand, we absolutely must let God be God.

                                                                                                                                    –Russ Bowman

Artfully Woven

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Vol.XXVI                         February 16, 2011                         No.4


Artfully Woven


Human beings love a good story.  For whatever psychological reason, we are attracted by the dramatic and fantastic.  Thus, most “best sellers” are fictional works, and the most successful and popular movies tend to be those that transcend reality.  And, while many people enjoy history or biography or other types of literature/media that are grounded in fact and reality, we all, to some degree, appreciate a compelling tale, artfully woven.  For the most part, my casual reading tends toward the fictional.  I like Louis L’Amour and I used to enjoy Tom Clancy (until he opted for a more “realistic” vulgarity in his tales).  I go back fairly regularly and read again Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, and “The Count of Monte Cristo” remains one of my all time favorite books.  These stories appeal to me for the same reason that fiction tends to appeal to everyone.  Fiction allows the writer to control the outcome, and to do so with as much drama and spectacle as he/she chooses.  While real life does sometimes imitate art and truth is sometimes “stranger than fiction,” such is not the norm.  Fiction captivates our minds because of its grandeur, it’s adventure, it’s fantasy, it’s carefully crafted twists and turns and surprises.  And, generally, because fiction turns out the way we want it to.  The good guys in the white hats nearly always win.


I offer these considerations because the religious world that considers itself “christian” has for the most part adopted whole-heartedly a doctrine that is essentially fiction.  Most protestant organizations in our day are zealous in their promotion of the concept of “millennialism.”  In short, this teaching proposes that Jesus Christ will accomplish the final activities of redemption in several stages, eventually establishing a physical kingdom upon the earth, over which He will reign for 1000 years.  Understand that there are myriad variations upon this idea, but the fundamental storyline is fairly-well established.  The story goes that God had long intended to establish His kingdom upon the earth and that He had revealed an essential time line for the fulfillment of such by means of certain Old Testament prophecies (especially featuring Daniel 9:24f).  However, instead of ascending to the throne of David in Jerusalem, Jesus was rejected by the Jews and crucified.  Thwarted in His plans, God then “suspended” prophetic time and inserted a parenthetic age known as the “church age.”  Jesus Christ was preached as the Son



of God and Savior of man and salvation has been offered to the Gentiles until the time of His return is accomplished.  At some point, prophetic time will restart, Jesus will invisibly “rapture” the faithful  and there will begin a seven year period of great tribulation upon the earth, wherein the Antichrist will appear and lead a great consortium of nations in warfare against the Jews, who will be converted to Christ and who will begin to re-establish the nation of Israel.  This hostility will culminate in the battle of Armageddon, when Jesus will reappear with the “church” from heaven.  They will return to the earth, win victory at Armageddon, and establish the kingdom of God (Israel) upon the earth and reign for 1000 years.  After this, God will proceed with final judgment which will result in the eternal destiny of heaven or hell.  Of course, as this fascinating tale is woven, there are great dramatic events which captivate our sense of the fantastic - the rapture; the post-rapture world; the identification and rise of the Antichrist; the conversion of the Jews and rebuilding of the temple; the amassing of evil forces; the “mother of all wars” - Armageddon; the spectacle of Jesus descending to accomplish victory; the world purged of sin; etc.  It’s a compelling tale, and it does appeal to our affection for the spectacular.  But there is one predominant problem with millennial teaching - it’s fiction.


Oh, I understand the difficulties of OT prophecy, and the challenges of properly understanding passages such as Matt.24, II Thes.1, and the book of Revelation.  I don’t have every answer that I would like to have regarding those sections of scripture.  And, the imagery which God employs in those passages and others is arresting.  Without doubt, apocalyptic literature is dramatic and fantastic.  And hard.  And were the issue of millennial doctrine simply a matter of accepting that God will establish an earthly kingdom for 1000 years prior to final judgment, I’d be unwilling to argue against it.  The problem is that God’s Word, in several ways, denies millennial doctrine.  The Bible clearly reveals that God’s kingdom is spiritual in nature, not physical (Lk.17:20-21; Jn.18:36).  The Bible clearly reveals that the church (God’s saved people) was God’s intended aim from the outset (Eph.3:8-11).  And the crucifixion of Jesus  as a sacrifice for all mankind was a part of God’s eternal purpose (I Cor.1:18-24; 2:7-9).  Millennialism essentially denies all of these.


But there is one problem with this fictional fabrication that transcends all others.  If millennialism is true, then God is not God at all.  If He originally intended to establish a physical kingdom with Jesus sitting upon the throne of David in Jerusalem, and man rejected Jesus and crucified Him in opposition to God’s will, then God has shown His inability to rule in this world.  According to millennialism, man thwarted God.  How am I supposed to believe that Jesus will be successful the next time He returns, if He couldn’t accomplish His task the first time?  I don’t believe in a God Who is not omnipotent and is incapable of accomplishing His will and defeating Satan and his forces.  But that is precisely the God of millennialism.  The Bible does not portray such a God.


Don’t buy into the fiction just because it is fantastic.  “Star Wars” is fantastic too, but that doesn’t make it real.


                                                                                                                                     --Russ Bowman

What Is The church of Christ?

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Vol.XXVI                              February 2, 2011                              No.3


What is the church of Christ?


The church of Christ as described in the Bible is not an institution or organization which has been established and structured by men.  The term "church" in the Bible means literally "the called out" and is simply a collective word for Christians, those individuals baptized into Christ (Acts 2:41,47; I Cor.12:12-27; Eph.1:22-23; 5:23-32).  It is used in two ways:  to describe all of those who have obeyed the gospel (the "universal church") Mt.16:18; Eph.1:22; 5:23; and to describe a collectivity of saints working together in a locality (the "local church") Acts 13:1; I Cor.1:2; I Thes.1:1.


The work of the local church as outlined in the New Testament is to provide an upbuilding spiritual environment for its members (Eph.4:11-16), to preach and teach the gospel (I Thes.1:1-8; II Tim.2:1-2), and to help those saints in need (Acts 6:1-6; 11:29-30).  The church exists that we might help one another in our efforts to reach heaven, seeking the spiritual welfare of other Christians (Gal.6:1-10).  Our mission is not social, recreational, or political.


We are concerned with scriptural authority for our activities and beliefs, thus we strive to speak where the Bible speaks, remain silent where the Bible is silent, do Bible things in Bible ways and call Bible things by Bible names (I Tim.1:3f; Gal.1:8-12).  The New Testament provides patterns for local church activity and our aim is a proper application of those principles and a respect for the silence of the scriptures (II Tim.1:13; 3:16-17; I Pet.4:11).


The worship of a local church follows the New Testament pattern of teaching (Acts 20:7), prayer (Acts 2:42; 12:5), and giving (I Cor.16:1-2; II Cor.9:6-8).  Also, we observe the Lord's supper (communion) every first day of the week (Acts 20:7; I Cor.11:23-29), and participate in congregational singing of "psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs" without the accompaniment of mechanical instruments of music (Eph.5:19; Col.3:16).


With regard to organization, the scriptures provide for no hierarchy beyond the local congregation.  Each local church is autonomous and independent of other local churches.  The overseers of each congregation are called elders and are chosen and appointed by the local church.  They are to provide for the spiritual needs of the congregation (I Tim.3:1-7; Titus 1:5-9; I Pet.5:1-4; Acts 20:17-31).  They are sometimes referred to as bishops (Phil.1:1).  Deacons are also appointed to assist the elders.  The elders serve as pastors, rather than the preacher, whose work is to preach, teach, and serve as an example in Christian life and service (I Tim.4:12-16; II Tim.4:2).


We invite you to join with us in our efforts to maintain New Testament Christianity in the present generation.

Displaying 7 - 9 of 11

Page 1 2 3 4